SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS SUGGESTS PRESIDENTIAL VOTE COUNTS MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED

Open letter to David Cameron, MP,

You said at the UNA meeting last week that Bush did not steal the 2004 election.
He did.
You also praised developments in the Lebanon and the Ukraine where new signs of democracy are emerging. Did you know that the discrepancy between the exit polls and the official result in America was as big as that reported in Ukraine?
It was enough to bring down the Government in Ukraine. In America, the media are so well controlled they can't get a proper debate going.

But a scientific report has just come out.

SCIENTIFIC ANALYSIS SUGGESTS PRESIDENTIAL VOTE COUNTS MAY HAVE BEEN ALTERED
Group of University Professors Urges Investigation of 2004 ElectionOfficially, President Bush won November's election by 2.5%, yet exit polls showed Kerry winning by 3%. According to a report to be released today by a group of university statisticians, the odds of a discrepancy this large between the national exit poll and election results happening by accident are close to 1 in a million.In other words, by random chance alone, it could not have happened. But it did.Two alternatives remain. Either something was wrong with the exit polling, or something was wrong with the vote count.Exit polls have been used to verify the integrity of elections in the Ukraine, in Latin America, in Germany, and elsewhere. Yet in November 2004, the U.S. exit poll discrepancy was much more than normal exit poll error (and similar to that of the invalid Ukraine election.)…
The report is available on-line:http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit_Polls_2004_Edison-Mitofsky.pdf An executive summary of the report by is available at:http://electionarchive.org/ucvAnalysis/US/Exit_Polls_summary.pdf